Language Evolution and Computation Bibliography

Our site (www.isrl.uiuc.edu/amag/langev) retired, please use https://langev.com instead.
Vito Trianni
2010
Evolution of Communication and Language in Embodied Agents, pages 161-178, 2010
We use Evolutionary Robotics to design robot controllers in which decision-making mechanisms to switch from solitary to social behavior are integrated with the mechanisms that underpin the sensory-motor repertoire of the robots. In particular, we study the evolution of behavioral ...MORE ⇓
We use Evolutionary Robotics to design robot controllers in which decision-making mechanisms to switch from solitary to social behavior are integrated with the mechanisms that underpin the sensory-motor repertoire of the robots. In particular, we study the evolution of behavioral and communicative skills in a categorization task. The individual decision-making structures are based on the integration over time of sensory information. The mechanisms for switching from solitary to social behavior and the ways in which the robots can affect each otheras behavior are not predetermined by the experimenter, but are aspects of our model designed by artificial evolution. Our results show that evolved robots manage to cooperate and collectively discriminate between different environments by developing a simple communication protocol based on sound signaling. Communication emerges in the absence of explicit selective pressure coded in the fitness function. The evolution of communication is neither trivial nor obvious; for a meaningful signaling system to evolve, evolution must produce both appropriate signals and appropriate reactions to signals. The use of communication proves to be adaptive for the group, even if, in principle, non-cooperating robots can be equally successful with cooperating robots.
2004
ANTS 2004, pages 130-141, 2004
Communication is often required for coordination of collective behaviours. Social insects like ants, termites or bees make use of different forms of communication, which can be roughly classified in three classes: indirect (stigmergic) communication, direct interaction and direct ...MORE ⇓
Communication is often required for coordination of collective behaviours. Social insects like ants, termites or bees make use of different forms of communication, which can be roughly classified in three classes: indirect (stigmergic) communication, direct interaction and direct communication. The use of stigmergic communication is predominant in social insects (e.g., the pheromone trails in ants), but also direct interactions (e.g., antennation in ants) and direct communication can be observed (e.g., the waggle dance of honey bee workers). Direct communication may be beneficial when a fast reaction is expected, as for instance, when a danger is detected and countermeasures must be taken. This is the case of hole avoidance, the task studied in this paper: a group of selfassembled robots - called swarm-bot - coordinately explores an arena containing holes, avoiding to fall into them. In particular, we study the use of direct communication in order to achieve a reaction to the detection of a hole faster than with the sole use of direct interactions through physical links. We rely on artificial evolution for the synthesis of neural network controllers, showing that evolving behaviours that make use of direct communication is more effective than exploiting direct interactions only.