Language Evolution and Computation Bibliography

Our site (www.isrl.uiuc.edu/amag/langev) retired, please use https://langev.com instead.
Simone Pika
2009
The Directed Scratch: Evidence for a Referential Gesture in Chimpanzees?
The Prehistory Of Language 9.0, 2009
Recent genetic evidence suggests that some of the key capacities for normal speech production might have developed in our hominid ancestors probably as little as 200,000 years ago (eg Davidson 2003; Enard et al. 2002). Many of the neural, anatomical, and ...
2008
Primate vocalization, gesture, and the evolution of human languagePDF
Current Anthropology 49(6):1053--1076, 2008
The performance of language is multimodal, not confined to speech. Review of monkey and ape communication demonstrates greater flexibility in the use of hands and body than for vocalization. Nonetheless, the gestural repertoire of any group of nonhuman primates is ...
Gestures of apes and pre-linguistic human children: Similar or different?
First Language 28(2):116--140, 2008
Abstract The majority of studies on animal communication provide evidence that gestural signalling plays an important role in the communication of non-human primates and resembles that of pre-linguistic and just-linguistic human infants in some important ways. ...
2006
Differences and similarities between the natural gestural communication of the great apes and human childrenPDF
Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on the Evolution of Language, pages 267-274, 2006
The majority of studies on animal communication provide evidence that gestural signaling plays an important role in the communication of nonhuman primates and resembles that of pre-linguistic and just-linguistic human infants in some important ways. However, ape gestures also ...MORE ⇓
The majority of studies on animal communication provide evidence that gestural signaling plays an important role in the communication of nonhuman primates and resembles that of pre-linguistic and just-linguistic human infants in some important ways. However, ape gestures also differ from the gestures of human infants in some important ways as well, and these differences might provide crucial clues for answering the question of how human language -- at least in its cognitive and social-cognitive aspects- evolved from the gestural communication of our ape-like ancestors. The present manuscript summarizes and compares recent studies on the gestural signaling of the great apes (Gorilla gorilla, Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Pongo pygmaeus) to enable a comparison with gestures in children. We focused on the three following aspects: 1) nature of gestures, 2) intentional use of gestures, 3) and learning of gestures. Our results show, that apes have multifaceted gestural repertoires and use their gestures intentionally. Although some group-specific gestures seem to be acquired via a social learning process, the majority of gestures are learned via individual learning. Importantly, all of the intentional produced gestures share two important characteristics that make them crucially different from human deictic and symbolic gestures: 1) they are almost invariably used in dyadic contexts and 2) they are used exclusively for imperative purposes. Implications for these differences are discussed.